Is this happening where you live? Some significant local news story breaks – a shooting, arson, bank robbery. The local reporter corners an eye-witness. “Tell us what you saw,” and the eye witness breaks into details so significant you can hear the District Attorney breathing harder. But, the witness doesn’t want to appear on camera or give his/her/its name. So the camera man focuses on the tattoo on the witness’s lower leg that says “I Love Brunettes” in Olde English lettering surrounding a cheesecake portrait of Stephanie Powers in her 1980’s TV role in Hart to Hart, perhaps a portrait tattoo of the witness’s seven children, or the inscription “Jane Doe Loves John Smith (crossed out) Joe Jones (crossed out) Mary Queen of Scots.” Nothing too unique.
It wasn’t that long ago that we saw on the evening news just that. The TV reporter telling us that the witness didn’t want her face shown but the cameraman had a clear shot of the snake tattoo climbing from her foot (with the green nail polish) up past the ankle encircling her shin. Haven’t these people ever heard of the phrase “No comment?” Or is he lure of being on television, even without being identified by name, too much for them?
We used to wonder about the intelligence of the TV eye-witness back when all you had to go on was the lack of front teeth, the baseball hat proclaiming the last tractor pull world championship, and the t-shirt with the logo and leftover barbecue sauce from the rib cook-off of four years previous. Now those people were at least colorful.
Recently we saw an eye-witness to a break-in across the street from the witness’s house where he was ‘just sitting” on the porch. He didn’t have a silly hat. He didn’t have a dirty t-shirt. He didn’t’ have a tattoo that we could see and we could see a lot because he didn’t have any shirt on. But he also didn’t mind his face being shown. It was a good counter-point to his shirtless body that the cameraman was having a tough time capturing all in one frame without his wide lens.
Don’t these people know they are going to be on television? Didn’t anybody tell them that when the truck with the call letters and the guy with camera and the lady with the microphone show up there would be a chance that a few people might be watching the film at 11? It significantly lessens the impact of the details that we now wonder if they were really that observant or were they fantasizing in whatever drug or alcohol haze they were in.
We used to think that the eye-witnesses who didn’t want to show their faces but let the cameras roam over their fairly unique and identifiable tattoos were just stupid. Actually we still do. Sorry, Mr. District Attorney. You can stop breathing hard now.
Now, that’s what we think. Really. How ‘bout you?